On the surface of things, this article is the review of David Feldman's Comedy Podcast, but for this particular review I'm going to vary the routine a bit by also revisiting an artist that I said not such great things about previously. And here's why.
I was at the airport picking up a friend the other day and while I waited I was listening to David Feldman's Comedy Podcast. I was listening to the 7/13 episode titled Comedia Del'Farte. It was good, not the best he's done but pretty much OK and his cast of supporting funny people always make the show better than the sum of its parts... more than just a stand up podcast. I dig their effort and the "Let's Put on a Show!" style of performance and the "let's smear boogers on the Mona Lisa" mentality. I have a couple favorite episodes and I'll get to them in a few minutes.
Anyway, Del'Farte ran its course and since I have several Feldmans in the queue, the next one started: the 7/12 episode with Todd Glass. Many of you will recognize that I didn't review Todd favorably the one and only time I included him in this blog. That was when I reviewed Jimmy Dore's show "Comedy and Everything Else". I mostly liked Jimmy's show but I didn't dig Todd. In fact, if you read that review, you'll kinda see that I never really have dug Todd. I felt like Todd was a conversational bully using noise, bluster, machine gun chatter and backhanded slights to control every single moment of any show that involved him. It was a giant "look at me" fit in the middle of somebody else's birthday party like you might expect to see in a 12- or 13-year-old ADD who skipped the Ritalin for a few days. Granted, that last bit, or the need to exhibit that particular part of their inner beast, describes 95% of all stand ups. But Todd just gets under my skin in a way that no other comic seems to. Worse than that, he breaks the cardinal rule of comedy. He isn't funny. Or at the very least, not very often.
You can pretty much do anything you want as a stand up. You can be a racist dwarf-tossing transgender Nazi who likes to mow down bunny heads using an old John Deere 325 riding mower with a satanic goat skull as a hood ornament... as long as it's funny.
Everything else is crap.
So, I'm at the airport, waiting for my friend at the wrong baggage carousel because he's coming in from Houston instead of his usual Chicago, and David Feldman introduces Todd Glass.
I admit it. I rolled my eyes a little and sighed just a little out of reflex. I'm human, I have a preconceived notion of what I can expect from Todd Glass. I understand that a lot of people find him funny, but for me, Todd pushes all the wrong buttons. And yeah, that feeling probably affects the way I perceive his humor. I come to the table with an idea that I don't like broccoli. It doesn't matter that somebody poured cheese over it or dipped it in ranch dressing or gold or the filtered pee of 15 virgins, I'm not gonna like it and I know that before I taste it and even if it is well done by everybody else's standard, I'm still going to say no thanks.
So yeah, I feel this way. I hate like hell that I have prejudices that color my opinions, but I do. I'm human, shoot me.
The show starts, Feldman does his written material. There's some yuks and twitters in the crowds. He introduces the folks who are normally there and then he brings on Glass. And for the next 10 minutes, Glass steps on every joke anybody else tries to make. He verbally bullied his way into nearly every second of the segment and he essentially hijacked the show. I should mention here that Feldman's show is mostly scripted like an old time radio show but there are times when they depart from that,... (those times seems like they are when Feldman and company know that a guest won't or can't follow the script.) At those times they just try to have a conversation. With Glass, good luck having a conversation. It's just him, rambling, throwing jokes that don't work, explaining why we're not smart enough to get the jokes and how nobody understands lighting in restaurants but him. (yes, lighting. It seems to be a recurring theme with Glass.)
I felt bad the first time I said that Todd Glass rubs me the wrong way. Maybe I was being unfair saying that he's irritating, pompous, overbearing and just flat out unfunny. But after listening to him screw up 10 minutes of somebody else's podcast, I think I was right. Todd Glass rubs me the wrong way. He's pompous, overbearing and just flat out unfunny. I've learned my lesson. If I don't want to come away from a podcast grinding my molars and thinking up new ways to say I don't enjoy Todd Glass as an entertainer I should avoid listening to anything with his name in the title or credits.
OK, there. Done. I've said all I will say about Todd Glass and I'm hopeful that I've actually typed the name Todd Glass for the last time. Now I'd like to tell you about David Feldman's Comedy Podcast and my favorite one or two episodes.
First, the show is an ensemble. Feldman is the lead; it's his name on the marquee, but David is helped quite a lot by his merrymaking minions, Alan Chapman (musical director and comedy songwriter/singer), Eddie Pepitone (sidekick/flunky/resident punching bag), Stefanae (yes, stef uh nay) Zamarano and Jim Earl. Others who also contribute regularly (as part of the Clutter Family) are Rick Overton, Jimmy Dore, Jane Edith Wilson and Ron Babcock. Each week, one or two guests add their voices to the scripted portion of the show as well as a possible interview segment.
As far as the written part of the show goes (and this is for both the cold open by Feldman and the scripted multi-character segment for the cast) the jokes contained therein aren't usually the kind that if you read them on paper you'd laugh out loud. You might say to yourself, "That's funny." You might smile a bit or let out a small heh heh. What makes this show laugh-out-loud funny for me, and what brings me back every week, isn't the "ripped from the very old headlines" stories that are stuffed to overflowing with double entendres and homocentric potty humor. It's the voices. The often deadpan sound of a cold reading from the guests who laugh in their lines, the voice of reason and calm that comes from Feldman reading meta jokes he isn't completely convinced about, the whiny snagglepuss of Alan Chapman as David's "wife" in their crossover (home life/podlife) relationship and finally, and most importantly, the completely manic histrionics of Eddie Pepitone.
Ah, Pepitone. In this show, used in this way, he is genius. I'm convinced (but just barely) that he should not carry his own show. 30 minutes of straight Eddie would border on too much Eddie, but in this show, he is the topping that turns soft serve into a sundae. Without Eddie, you've got ice cream. Everybody likes ice cream, but I really love a good sundae.
My two favorite shows so far were almost 100% scripted plays. The first was when guest Patton Oswalt appeared. The show was a send-up of 70's sitcoms. The gag was that Patton, as a kid, had starred in a show called "Patton Pending". This show was "blow Pepsi out your nose" funny in multiple places and Peppitone played the part of a wizened, forest-dwelling uncle dispensing advice and odd suggestions to the young Patton ( but I swear that for at least a week I thought the part had been played by Richard Kind). I nearly peed my pants at one point and I hadn't done that since I saw the mime telling the eponymous joke in Paul Provenza's movie "The Aristocrats" start to work over the small imaginary dog in the act.
My second most fav was the Changeling episode with Paul Provenza as the Chief of Police. Rather than a child being abducted, it was Eddie the sidekick. The super effective, talented and well loved replacement Eddie (following the plot of the movie) was nearly as funny as the real moronic, oafish and odorous Eddie. It wasn't pee-my-pants funny, but it was well-written, mostly well-performed and had those moments during the play when the actors crack each other up that I've always thought allows the audience into the joke as conspirators rather than as mere spectators and makes the entire experience more than just watching a funny skit.
I wish more podcasts were like David Feldman's Comedy podcast. I think episodic, podcast teleplays (podiplays? pladipods?) are liked by people who look for podcasts to listen to. Such shows could potentially do that thing that advertisers sooooo slobber for, namely, bring receptive listeners back to the same place over and over again and make them great targets for commercials. The first show that I want that to happen for: "Patton Pending". I know it's a send up "one-off" show, but I want to hear as many episodes of that show as they can write. But next time I'll pee before I listen.
My rating scale
Is this podcast entertaining? - Yes, oh yes
Am I likely to listen to the next podcast? – I do every week
Do I recommend this podcast to friends? – Without reservation
The Podiwan reviews comedy podcasts created specifically for distribution via the web.
Showing posts with label Jimmy Dore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jimmy Dore. Show all posts
Friday, August 13, 2010
Saturday, July 17, 2010
The Podiwan Review 15 - Comedy Film Nerds
The Comedy Film Nerds are Graham Elwood (@grahamelwood) and Chris Mancini (@myopicprod). They're comics and filmmakers and they do a podcast that involves both of those things. Graham and Chris invite a (usually) well known comedian or new media personality and then they discuss movies (new and old), DVD releases, trailers, movie posters and pretty much all things movie. Since the podcast runs about an hour, they also horse around a little and talk about friends, other stand ups, places they've worked and the state of comedy in general. Though they aren't always funny (who among us is) they are generally good tempered, quick witted and willing to participate in bad puns, anecdotal meanderings and the occasional sidebar that could take a while to know if it will pay off or not.
There are only about 16 or 17 shows available for download at present so the show is basically new. Based on that newness and without checking dates (or generally doing some homework) I'd have to say that this show is very much like Jordan, Jesse, GO! coming out of Canada. JJG has over a hundred shows and Comedy Film Nerds is a near copy except that they discuss movies as a focus and JJG does so only occasionally. Both shows are hosted by two stand up comics. Both shows have guests from the stand up community. Both shows feel very much the same in their conversational style (though you have to get used to the "ahboots" with JJG). The biggest difference other than the focus is that Comedy Film Nerds is funnier and more entertaining. I've laughed while listening to CFN but I have not done that with JJG. And without making this review too much about Jordan, Jesse, GO! (too late) I would say that even if JJG isn't particularly bad, it isn't particularly good either. It's listenable and mild but not really engrossing. You can listen to it on a drive and it won't draw too much of your attention away from driving, but it isn't so boring that you fall asleep and kill a family on vacation unlucky enough to be in oncoming traffic.
Back to Comedy Film Nerds. OK, usually the best parts about most comedy podcasts are the guests. This is especially true of CFN. Though Graham is consistently entertaining and funny, he's better with a funny guest to bounce with. The show has hosted a fair number of big names in it's short run including; Paul F Tomkins, Doug Benson, Mike Schmidt, Chris Hardwick, David Feldman and Jimmy Dore. That's a pretty nice list of friends and an impressive list of guests.
While reviewing movies, trailers, directors, and whatever else is connected to moviedom, they recognize no sacred cows which is a little strange given that they are also acclaimed film makers (Oscar nominated I believe as well as Smithsonian recognized). You'd think that if they had hopes of getting something into production any time soon, they might be a bit more politic about the things they say, but, refreshingly, they are not. Either they don't care who hears it, or they're unaware of how many people DO hear it. CFN has been, since its first episode, in the top downloads list on iTunes for comedy podcasts. Some of that is due to the dismal pickings for new comedy podcasts, but also certainly, some of it is due to the show being entertaining.
I only have a couple of gripes about the show at this point in their development. The first gripe is that it took them so long to figure out that they needed to have a guest. Without a guest, they are just exactly as boring as Jordan, Jesse, GO! With a guest,.. funny. Without,.. boring. With, Funny. That's a lesson to everybody else. Know it now so you don't have to stumble on it later.
But they know it now so let's judge them now.
First gripe and this is admittedly picayune; in every show so far there have been conversational strings or moments that just drag on and on and on and on before they find a way out. I feel their pain and understand that sometimes it is hard to recover from a dead end. I would only suggest that they see it sooner and bail rather than sticking with it until the bitter end we all see coming. Second gripe; the sound quality was a little poor until they just recently got a sound board and some better mics in the "world headquarters and garage" studio. If I was going to do a podcast with more than one person speaking, the first thing I might consider after I found a person to the be the "other", a guest for us to talk to and a place for us to do that, might be a decent sound recording set up including multiple mics, a multichannel board and a way to keep the outside noises,... outside. Other than that, I have no complaints. It ain't the funniest thing on pod, but it is worth listening to. And the line up of guests puts it on my list of weekly "listen-tos".
My Rating Scale
Was I Entertained? Yes, usually.
Am I likely to listen to the next podcast? Yes, probably.
Will I recommend this podcast to a friend? Yes, most likely.
There are only about 16 or 17 shows available for download at present so the show is basically new. Based on that newness and without checking dates (or generally doing some homework) I'd have to say that this show is very much like Jordan, Jesse, GO! coming out of Canada. JJG has over a hundred shows and Comedy Film Nerds is a near copy except that they discuss movies as a focus and JJG does so only occasionally. Both shows are hosted by two stand up comics. Both shows have guests from the stand up community. Both shows feel very much the same in their conversational style (though you have to get used to the "ahboots" with JJG). The biggest difference other than the focus is that Comedy Film Nerds is funnier and more entertaining. I've laughed while listening to CFN but I have not done that with JJG. And without making this review too much about Jordan, Jesse, GO! (too late) I would say that even if JJG isn't particularly bad, it isn't particularly good either. It's listenable and mild but not really engrossing. You can listen to it on a drive and it won't draw too much of your attention away from driving, but it isn't so boring that you fall asleep and kill a family on vacation unlucky enough to be in oncoming traffic.
Back to Comedy Film Nerds. OK, usually the best parts about most comedy podcasts are the guests. This is especially true of CFN. Though Graham is consistently entertaining and funny, he's better with a funny guest to bounce with. The show has hosted a fair number of big names in it's short run including; Paul F Tomkins, Doug Benson, Mike Schmidt, Chris Hardwick, David Feldman and Jimmy Dore. That's a pretty nice list of friends and an impressive list of guests.
While reviewing movies, trailers, directors, and whatever else is connected to moviedom, they recognize no sacred cows which is a little strange given that they are also acclaimed film makers (Oscar nominated I believe as well as Smithsonian recognized). You'd think that if they had hopes of getting something into production any time soon, they might be a bit more politic about the things they say, but, refreshingly, they are not. Either they don't care who hears it, or they're unaware of how many people DO hear it. CFN has been, since its first episode, in the top downloads list on iTunes for comedy podcasts. Some of that is due to the dismal pickings for new comedy podcasts, but also certainly, some of it is due to the show being entertaining.
I only have a couple of gripes about the show at this point in their development. The first gripe is that it took them so long to figure out that they needed to have a guest. Without a guest, they are just exactly as boring as Jordan, Jesse, GO! With a guest,.. funny. Without,.. boring. With, Funny. That's a lesson to everybody else. Know it now so you don't have to stumble on it later.
But they know it now so let's judge them now.
First gripe and this is admittedly picayune; in every show so far there have been conversational strings or moments that just drag on and on and on and on before they find a way out. I feel their pain and understand that sometimes it is hard to recover from a dead end. I would only suggest that they see it sooner and bail rather than sticking with it until the bitter end we all see coming. Second gripe; the sound quality was a little poor until they just recently got a sound board and some better mics in the "world headquarters and garage" studio. If I was going to do a podcast with more than one person speaking, the first thing I might consider after I found a person to the be the "other", a guest for us to talk to and a place for us to do that, might be a decent sound recording set up including multiple mics, a multichannel board and a way to keep the outside noises,... outside. Other than that, I have no complaints. It ain't the funniest thing on pod, but it is worth listening to. And the line up of guests puts it on my list of weekly "listen-tos".
My Rating Scale
Was I Entertained? Yes, usually.
Am I likely to listen to the next podcast? Yes, probably.
Will I recommend this podcast to a friend? Yes, most likely.
Monday, May 3, 2010
The Podiwan Review 4 – Comedy and Everything Else
Jimmy Dore, Stef Samorano and, as an uncredited regular, Todd Glass get together and talk about, guess what, Comedy and Everything Else @caeeshow. I’ll start right up front by saying, generally, I don’t get Todd Glass. For me, he’s not funny. He’s loud, he interrupts everybody (hosts and guests alike) for what he thinks is a good point but what turns out to be not really.
Have you ever had a conversation with somebody and they say something like, “I know just what you mean,..” and then go on to say something that tells you that they really didn’t get what you said because it was so off point that you have to wonder if he’s that far off on purpose of if he’s just not that bright. This is how I perceive Todd Glass. That said, I know people who really like Glass, I’m just not one of them.
On the other hand, Jimmy Dore and Stef Samorano seem to be levels above Todd. I get the impression that at times, they look at each other with knowing glances when Todd misses something and they know there’s comedy in his obtuse density. They occasionally poke at him for each other’s entertainment knowing that Todd either won’t hear it because he’s more interested in what he’s saying about himself or that it will sail over him. But this is me putting my impressions over the top of it. I also see from their website that Todd has left the show but there are quite a few shows in the library that include his "comedy stylings".
Dozens of great guests have appeared on the show, including Jim Gaffigan, Jimmy Pardo. Sara Silverman, Janeane Garofalo, Chris Hardwick, Doug Benson, Patton Oswalt, Paul F Tompkins, etc. The conversations are topical and unstaged. Jimmy and Stef know how to engage the guests and keep things moving. I’m always happy to hear that people who make their living being funny also seem to be politically aware. This show reminds us, through the topics of conversation, that comedians are keen observers of not only their industry but of popular culture. 88 shows are available in the backlog and they’re downloadable on iTunes, and several other new media outlets. As long as Todd isn’t there, the show is 3 out of 4 stars with highlight moments popping out of the 2 hour shows every 10 or 15 minutes.
I don't always get a warm fuzzy off of Jimmy, but I was never once put off by him either. I think Dore would go out of his way to make a person feel comfortable and that is, after all, the hallmark of a good host.
Stef seems pleasant and maybe a little like the funny chick at the party who you'd do if the really hot chicks turned out to like good looking wealthy guys with expensive cars instead of pale puffy overweight stoners with a great D&D story about orcs and fairies and Cheetos dust on their shirts.
My rating scale
Is this podcast entertaining? - Sometimes
Am I likely to listen to the next podcast? – If I’m out of other podcasts
Do I recommend this podcast to friends? –Not so far
Have you ever had a conversation with somebody and they say something like, “I know just what you mean,..” and then go on to say something that tells you that they really didn’t get what you said because it was so off point that you have to wonder if he’s that far off on purpose of if he’s just not that bright. This is how I perceive Todd Glass. That said, I know people who really like Glass, I’m just not one of them.
On the other hand, Jimmy Dore and Stef Samorano seem to be levels above Todd. I get the impression that at times, they look at each other with knowing glances when Todd misses something and they know there’s comedy in his obtuse density. They occasionally poke at him for each other’s entertainment knowing that Todd either won’t hear it because he’s more interested in what he’s saying about himself or that it will sail over him. But this is me putting my impressions over the top of it. I also see from their website that Todd has left the show but there are quite a few shows in the library that include his "comedy stylings".
Dozens of great guests have appeared on the show, including Jim Gaffigan, Jimmy Pardo. Sara Silverman, Janeane Garofalo, Chris Hardwick, Doug Benson, Patton Oswalt, Paul F Tompkins, etc. The conversations are topical and unstaged. Jimmy and Stef know how to engage the guests and keep things moving. I’m always happy to hear that people who make their living being funny also seem to be politically aware. This show reminds us, through the topics of conversation, that comedians are keen observers of not only their industry but of popular culture. 88 shows are available in the backlog and they’re downloadable on iTunes, and several other new media outlets. As long as Todd isn’t there, the show is 3 out of 4 stars with highlight moments popping out of the 2 hour shows every 10 or 15 minutes.
I don't always get a warm fuzzy off of Jimmy, but I was never once put off by him either. I think Dore would go out of his way to make a person feel comfortable and that is, after all, the hallmark of a good host.
Stef seems pleasant and maybe a little like the funny chick at the party who you'd do if the really hot chicks turned out to like good looking wealthy guys with expensive cars instead of pale puffy overweight stoners with a great D&D story about orcs and fairies and Cheetos dust on their shirts.
My rating scale
Is this podcast entertaining? - Sometimes
Am I likely to listen to the next podcast? – If I’m out of other podcasts
Do I recommend this podcast to friends? –Not so far
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


