Comedy podcasts, thrown in a large container and shaken for a while, stratify into aggregate groups. The vast majority of podcasts are essentially a comedian or a comedian and his or her friends, sitting around and talking. The next largest group is that first category but with guests. The smallest fraction of the comedy podcast world is made up of produced shows... which is a shame because they are some of the best. Superego Podcast: Profiles in Self Obsession is one of the best of the best. Superego (@gosuperego) is an edited improv podcast that is so funny that I have, at times, found it difficult to breath or maintain urinary control. The only problem with this podcast, as far as I'm concerned, is that the shows are too short and there are too few of them. Each podcast is roughly half an hour in length and there are 17 shows in a season. Superego is currently in the middle of season 3 except that the troupe has recently been busy trying to make a living and have had less time to put out much more than a few short specialty episodes (joint efforts with the folks at Thrilling Adventure Hour).
The framework for the podcast is psychological case studies and the main performers are casts as mental health professionals. Well, not so much cast as photographed. The improvised sketches don't actually center on a psychosis. They're just funny, but they're introduced as a syndrome, malady or affected disorder and the characters in the given bit are, at least for comedic purposes, within the definition of that disorder.
Superego members (Dr.)Jeremy Carter, (Dr.)Matt Gourley, Mark McConville and Jeff Crocker improvise and then edit down bits to 3-5 minute chunks of pure lunacy. They regularly revisit sketch topics and characters that have previously produced comedy gold. To date, those mines are still producing. My personal favorites include Shunt McGuppin, a country music legend with no filter on his monologue, Maggie the GPS voice with too much emotional investment, Dueling Announcers Bruce" the Throat Hume" and Ed "the Inflection" Oliva, Imogene Kanouse aggressive horn-dog with a throat buzzer, Rev. Leroy Jenkins, Hart and Sole - Wrestler Voice Over Guys and the conversational Cylon Warriors from the 70's version of Battlestar Galactica. I can't list all of their sketches and characters as favorites as it defeats the concept of favorites, but honestly, I haven't heard anything from them that wasn't funny or that I wanted to skip over to get to something else.
As stated previously, Superego Podcast is edited improvisation. That description bears discussion in that it goes to the heart of why this is both polished and wildly creative. The Superego group will begin with a basic premise, start the recording and then just riff. They may have a few lines or gags that they want to hit on the way through, but mostly it is stream of consciousness. There are other improv podcasts out there and though they are often funny for long stretches, they also have those moments that, as a listener, you wish they might have skipped, and as artists, you can bet they would have preferred to cut out. Those others are "produced" shows and I appreciate their risk taking and basic comedy chops, but, the thing that sets Superego apart is that they go back into the recording and cut out the fluff, the crap and the unfunny. They make it tight. So tight, in fact, that it is often hard to breathe and one might have to go back and re-listen to catch everything. The editing genius of Matt Gourley, who also edits other podcasts such as Judge John Hodgman and The Sound of Young America, is the secret ingredient that makes this podcast more than just funny people having fun and sharing it. It becomes comedy art.
The list of comedic talent that lines up to work with this group is truly impressive. Giants in improv as well as some of the best known standups, writers and personalities come out of the woodwork to get into a sketch with Superego. Here's a short list (well not really short but it is impressive): Patton Oswalt, Jason Sudeikis, John Hodgman, Drew Carey, Greg Proops, Paul F. Tompkins, Andy Daly, Colin Hanks, Steve Agee, Julie Klausner, Joe Lo Truglio, Rich Sommer, James Urbaniak, Jesse Thorn and Mark Gagliardi.
The dearth of podcasts that go beyond sitting and talking, even among funny people, requires that when we see something as wonderfully creative and funny as Superego, that we make absolutely sure the word gets out. I don't think there's an immediate chance of this podcast going away, but people who want good podcast programming from talented people need to support this kind of show to make sure that there is always a place for it.
I can see no shortcomings to this podcast other than that they just don't make enough of them. Also, inasmuch as I'm happy to enjoy several episodes in a row, they could go longer on each episode without offending this listener. There are 3 seasons of shows to work your way through, so those new to the podcast won't have to suffer shortages until they are well and truly addicted.
My rating scale
Is this podcast entertaining? - Yes. To the point of asphyxiation.
Am I likely to listen to the next podcast? – Yes, almost as soon as it plops.
Do I recommend this podcast to friends? – Yes, whenever I can.
The Podiwan reviews comedy podcasts created specifically for distribution via the web.
Showing posts with label Greg Proops. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greg Proops. Show all posts
Friday, May 11, 2012
Friday, February 11, 2011
The Podiwan Review 18 - The Smartest Man in the World
A year ago, all I knew of Greg Proops was what I'd seen on re-runs of the BritCom improv show "Who's Line is it Anyway" and the barely retooled American version that ran over here for a few seasons. I'd also seen a couple of short, taped tidbits of stand up on basic cable showcases. He seemed a lively improvisational entertainer and he had an easy time pulling deep references out of thin air at a lightning pace. Then last year I started listening to podcasts. A lot of them.
I'd begun reviewing comedy podcasts and you'd be surprised how many you have to listen to in order to
A) Find one that fits the comedy, length and format profile,
B) find one that is good enough, bad enough or just plan released enough that it is worth doing, and
C) make an informed comment that goes beyond I liked this or I didn't like that.
Anyway, Proops popped up on the radar quite a lot. Apparently, he's a respected guy within the stand up community. Since I listen to these people a great deal and feel like I've come to know them, their respect of him carries weight with me. (I realize they don't know me, don't want to know me and are basically contemptuous of reviews and critiques.) Occasionally somebody would mention Proops and speak well of him. Then I started finding podcasts with him as a featured guest or one of several appearing onstage, etc. It was clear from early on that he is considerably funnier and more culturally plugged in than censored network television could ever show. His comedy monologue is subversive from time to time, left leaning most of the time and graduate level cultural studies all of the time. It is probably a challenge that most networks don't feel the average viewer is up to. Also, though he can, he doesn't usually work clean. He isn't dropping F bombs all the time but he's not shy about it either though he is more opften likely to say "kittens". GP is acutely aware of funny at a skilled master practitioner's level and isn't going to ruin a good bit with the wrong words; dirty or otherwise.
So anyway, he's funny. Lotsa funny. All kinds of funny. Yeah, he seems a little affected, fastidious, aloof and above it all. Add horn-rimmed glasses, "interesting" hair, a nasally, slightly effeminate Noel Coward tone and Buddy Holly suits with Beatles boots. It's a kind of retro metro feel. For a long while I just figured he was gay. I assume he gets that a lot.
But really, get past that. He's not gay and it matters not the least. I mention it only because it is part of the definition of features and bearing,... how one is received, perceived. whatever. I couldn't freekin care less who he loves or how often but I'm describing him and that's part of the description.
Moving on, A couple of months ago, Greg Proops began recording a weekly (though it wasn't exactly weekly at first) monologue in front of paying guests and then posting it on iTunes as "The Smartest Man in the World" or the Proopcast from Bar Lubich in West Hollywood. Greg displays an intellectualism with which lesser comics might alienate the audience but he is able to create a suave and sophisticated jocularity. Even when it seems like he might have lost the crowd momentarily as they parse the previous parcel, he pushes onward, sometimes slogging, chest deep in a swamp of names, dates and other significata until magically, he ends up some place meaningful (and occasionally funny) as though he had intended it all along.
I'm convinced that most times he's just relying on his innate ability to string words together rather than any type of actual planning. When he arrives at some philosophical point or a punchline (or both), he may be as surprised as anybody else. I'm pretty sure that the joke has just expressed itself to him mere fractions of a second ahead of when he's going to reveal it to us.
On a recent show, when discussing a new book available about Cleopatra, Proops, in a 3 or 4 minute stretch made historical and literary references that jumped between centuries, drew cultural significance about people then and now, built laughs out of thin air, and intelligently reviewed a book currently topping the NYT-BSL. When the crowd got lost in the middle, he brought them back. When they decided they might not think of it as funnily as he did, he nicely badgered them into getting back on the boat with him and explained how the rest of the ride would go. To the audience's credit, after they came back in, they stuck with him until the end.
The Smartest Man in the World Podcast with Greg Proops is not for everybody. You have to listen. You have to follow and you have to be able to connect cultural references from more than just your own culture. On the plus side, he is a likable guy who seems honest and reasonable in his mostly left oriented politics. He is also just about as smart as he says he is (though not really the smartest man in the world) and thoroughly engaging. I listen to his show in rapt attention as I try to follow his "through line" like one of those visual acuity tests you have to take to work for the phone company.
My rating scale
Is this podcast entertaining? - very much so, even if a little challenging
Am I likely to listen to the next podcast? – guaranteed yes
Do I recommend this podcast to friends? – Quite a lot and without reservation
I'd begun reviewing comedy podcasts and you'd be surprised how many you have to listen to in order to
A) Find one that fits the comedy, length and format profile,
B) find one that is good enough, bad enough or just plan released enough that it is worth doing, and
C) make an informed comment that goes beyond I liked this or I didn't like that.
Anyway, Proops popped up on the radar quite a lot. Apparently, he's a respected guy within the stand up community. Since I listen to these people a great deal and feel like I've come to know them, their respect of him carries weight with me. (I realize they don't know me, don't want to know me and are basically contemptuous of reviews and critiques.) Occasionally somebody would mention Proops and speak well of him. Then I started finding podcasts with him as a featured guest or one of several appearing onstage, etc. It was clear from early on that he is considerably funnier and more culturally plugged in than censored network television could ever show. His comedy monologue is subversive from time to time, left leaning most of the time and graduate level cultural studies all of the time. It is probably a challenge that most networks don't feel the average viewer is up to. Also, though he can, he doesn't usually work clean. He isn't dropping F bombs all the time but he's not shy about it either though he is more opften likely to say "kittens". GP is acutely aware of funny at a skilled master practitioner's level and isn't going to ruin a good bit with the wrong words; dirty or otherwise.
So anyway, he's funny. Lotsa funny. All kinds of funny. Yeah, he seems a little affected, fastidious, aloof and above it all. Add horn-rimmed glasses, "interesting" hair, a nasally, slightly effeminate Noel Coward tone and Buddy Holly suits with Beatles boots. It's a kind of retro metro feel. For a long while I just figured he was gay. I assume he gets that a lot.
But really, get past that. He's not gay and it matters not the least. I mention it only because it is part of the definition of features and bearing,... how one is received, perceived. whatever. I couldn't freekin care less who he loves or how often but I'm describing him and that's part of the description.
Moving on, A couple of months ago, Greg Proops began recording a weekly (though it wasn't exactly weekly at first) monologue in front of paying guests and then posting it on iTunes as "The Smartest Man in the World" or the Proopcast from Bar Lubich in West Hollywood. Greg displays an intellectualism with which lesser comics might alienate the audience but he is able to create a suave and sophisticated jocularity. Even when it seems like he might have lost the crowd momentarily as they parse the previous parcel, he pushes onward, sometimes slogging, chest deep in a swamp of names, dates and other significata until magically, he ends up some place meaningful (and occasionally funny) as though he had intended it all along.
I'm convinced that most times he's just relying on his innate ability to string words together rather than any type of actual planning. When he arrives at some philosophical point or a punchline (or both), he may be as surprised as anybody else. I'm pretty sure that the joke has just expressed itself to him mere fractions of a second ahead of when he's going to reveal it to us.
On a recent show, when discussing a new book available about Cleopatra, Proops, in a 3 or 4 minute stretch made historical and literary references that jumped between centuries, drew cultural significance about people then and now, built laughs out of thin air, and intelligently reviewed a book currently topping the NYT-BSL. When the crowd got lost in the middle, he brought them back. When they decided they might not think of it as funnily as he did, he nicely badgered them into getting back on the boat with him and explained how the rest of the ride would go. To the audience's credit, after they came back in, they stuck with him until the end.
The Smartest Man in the World Podcast with Greg Proops is not for everybody. You have to listen. You have to follow and you have to be able to connect cultural references from more than just your own culture. On the plus side, he is a likable guy who seems honest and reasonable in his mostly left oriented politics. He is also just about as smart as he says he is (though not really the smartest man in the world) and thoroughly engaging. I listen to his show in rapt attention as I try to follow his "through line" like one of those visual acuity tests you have to take to work for the phone company.
My rating scale
Is this podcast entertaining? - very much so, even if a little challenging
Am I likely to listen to the next podcast? – guaranteed yes
Do I recommend this podcast to friends? – Quite a lot and without reservation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

